Fix WireGuard inbound domain-based routing by storing sniffing config at init time

The root cause of issue #4760 was that the sniffing configuration and inbound tag
were being stored during Process() instead of at initialization time. This caused
a race condition where concurrent connections would overwrite each other's session
information, breaking domain-based routing.

The fix follows the same pattern as the TUN handler:
- Save tag and sniffingRequest during NewServer (at creation time)
- Use these saved values in forwardConnection for each new connection

This ensures that each connection uses the correct sniffing configuration that was
set for the inbound, regardless of concurrent connections from multiple WireGuard peers.

Co-authored-by: RPRX <63339210+RPRX@users.noreply.github.com>

proxy/wireguard/server.go

@@ -26,15 +26,15 @@ var nullDestination = net.TCPDestination(net.AnyIP, 0)
 type Server struct {
 	bindServer *netBindServer
 
-	info          routingInfo
-	policyManager policy.Manager
+	info            routingInfo
+	policyManager   policy.Manager
+	tag             string
+	sniffingRequest session.SniffingRequest
 }
 
 type routingInfo struct {
-	ctx         context.Context
-	dispatcher  routing.Dispatcher
-	inboundTag  *session.Inbound
-	contentTag  *session.Content
+	ctx        context.Context
+	dispatcher routing.Dispatcher
 }
 
 func NewServer(ctx context.Context, conf *DeviceConfig) (*Server, error) {
@@ -58,6 +58,14 @@ func NewServer(ctx context.Context, conf *DeviceConfig) (*Server, error) {
 		policyManager: v.GetFeature(policy.ManagerType()).(policy.Manager),
 	}
 
+	// Retrieve tag and sniffing config from context (set by AlwaysOnInboundHandler)
+	if inbound := session.InboundFromContext(ctx); inbound != nil {
+		server.tag = inbound.Tag
+	}
+	if content := session.ContentFromContext(ctx); content != nil {
+		server.sniffingRequest = content.SniffingRequest
+	}
+
 	tun, err := conf.createTun()(endpoints, int(conf.Mtu), server.forwardConnection)
 	if err != nil {
 		return nil, err
@@ -81,8 +89,6 @@ func (s *Server) Process(ctx context.Context, network net.Network, conn stat.Con
 	s.info = routingInfo{
 		ctx:        ctx,
 		dispatcher: dispatcher,
-		inboundTag: session.InboundFromContext(ctx),
-		contentTag: session.ContentFromContext(ctx),
 	}
 
 	ep, err := s.bindServer.ParseEndpoint(conn.RemoteAddr().String())
@@ -129,21 +135,21 @@ func (s *Server) forwardConnection(dest net.Destination, conn net.Conn) {
 	ctx, cancel := context.WithCancel(core.ToBackgroundDetachedContext(s.info.ctx))
 	sid := session.NewID()
 	ctx = c.ContextWithID(ctx, sid)
-	inbound := session.Inbound{} // since promiscuousModeHandler mixed-up context, we shallow copy inbound (tag) and content (configs)
-	if s.info.inboundTag != nil {
-		inbound = *s.info.inboundTag
-	}
-	inbound.Name = "wireguard"
-	inbound.CanSpliceCopy = 3
 
-	// overwrite the source to use the tun address for each sub context.
-	// Since gvisor.ForwarderRequest doesn't provide any info to associate the sub-context with the Parent context
-	// Currently we have no way to link to the original source address
-	inbound.Source = net.DestinationFromAddr(conn.RemoteAddr())
-	ctx = session.ContextWithInbound(ctx, &inbound)
-	if s.info.contentTag != nil {
-		ctx = session.ContextWithContent(ctx, s.info.contentTag)
+	inbound := session.Inbound{
+		Name:          "wireguard",
+		Tag:           s.tag,
+		CanSpliceCopy: 3,
+		// overwrite the source to use the tun address for each sub context.
+		// Since gvisor.ForwarderRequest doesn't provide any info to associate the sub-context with the Parent context
+		// Currently we have no way to link to the original source address
+		Source: net.DestinationFromAddr(conn.RemoteAddr()),
 	}
+
+	ctx = session.ContextWithInbound(ctx, &inbound)
+	ctx = session.ContextWithContent(ctx, &session.Content{
+		SniffingRequest: s.sniffingRequest,
+	})
 	ctx = session.SubContextFromMuxInbound(ctx)
 
 	plcy := s.policyManager.ForLevel(0)